Online Voting – Who’s Rushing?

Opponents have been telling us not to “rush” into online voting for years. Who’s rushing?

PBS recently ran a segment devoted to online voting. It began by telling the compelling story of West Virginia Secretary of State Natalie Tennant and her bold commitment to providing access to overseas voters. Unfortunately the piece then made the typical mistake of treating opponents as technical experts, while never interviewing the real technical experts. This is a common media treatment of the issue.

The piece also ended in a very typical way:

MILES O’BRIEN: “No one wants to disenfranchise the people who take the real shots for our country, but a rush to bring our voting online might invite another kind of national security threat”.

Ah yes, the ole “Don’t Rush” trick.

Mr. O’Brien, I have one simple question for you. Who’s rushing? Continue reading

Posted in Online Internet Voting Blog Posts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Voting Access Heroine: Natalie Tennant (West Virginia Secretary of State)

West Virginia Secretary of State Natalie Tennant


Opponents of online voting may have chosen the wrong public official to try to scare away with their typical gang-up bullying tactics.

Natalie Tennant is the Secretary of State of West Virginia. As Dr. Kelleher reported on his blog last summer, Ms. Tennant took seriously her duty to provide voting access to overseas military voters in her state, and implemented an extremely successful online voting pilot there.

Ms. Tennant’s husband served overseas, and it was his recounting of the disconnection our service people feel from the process back home that helped drive her to do better in her state.

Dr. Kelleher also chronicled the treatment of Ms. Tennant by a group of well known opponents of online voting at a recent “symposium” discussing online voting in that state. His piece ‘”Cyberbullying” in Connecticut”‘, reveals a discussion panel packed with the same old tired names of academic paper worshippers. Even the audience was clearly packed with detractors. Ms. Tennant was invited to appear to talk about the success in her state, which she did. After that the symposium was dominated by the usual suspects in this debate.

The smear job in Connecticut actually came to my attention when a detractor began “crowing” about it on his blog, even including full video of the symposium.

It appears that this close-knit group of cowardly bullies is not used to running up against public officials with the kind of backbone that Ms. Tennant has.

Last week Secretary of State Tennant published a piece in “Government Technology” supporting the goal of moving our election systems into the 21st century. She calls on these critics, who claim they want a reliable election system, to participate in moving forward rather than using fear to hold us back.

With Ms. Tennant’s permission I am proud to republish her piece in its entirety. I would also like to take the opportunity to thank this brave woman for all she has done, and clearly will continue to do, for the voters of her state and this country.

http://www.govtech.com/e-government/Making-the-Case-for-Online-Voting.html
Making the Case for Online Voting (Opinion)
June 29, 2012 By Natalie E. Tennant

Editor’s note: Natalie Tennant is the Secretary of State of West Virginia. She wrote this column for the July issue of Government Technology magazine.

In 2010, West Virginia initiated a pilot program to provide deployed military and overseas citizens the opportunity to cast their ballot quickly and securely over the Internet. That year, 31 states provided military and overseas voters enhanced ballot access. This included electronic delivery of ballots, online access to ballots, and a variety of electronic ballot return options.
Continue reading

Posted in Online Internet Voting Blog Posts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Online Voting: The Conversation

As in any important public debate, all sides must be heard!

I often talk about the conversation about online voting and how one-sided it can be. When I refer to this “conversation” I am referring to it in a very general sense. No matter what the forum – online blog posts, comments sections of online articles,cable television, local and national radio, or newspapers – I strongly believe that the future of online voting in the United States lies in the framing of “the conversation”.

The reason I started this blog is because when I first began to research the subject I was shocked by how one-sided that conversation was. I started of course by searching the terms “internet voting” and “online voting”. Expecting to find a mixture of results perhaps talking about the current status of the technology, I was instead met with nothing but very “over the top”, loud and often nasty opposition to the very thought of Online Voting. Once I thoroughly researched the subject I realized that the average person was being highly misled by some very avid activist detractors.

The detractors of online voting have completely dominated the conversation for over a decade by successfully controlling the framing of that conversation.

But hopefully times are changing. I was recently asked to participate in a live NPR radio show discussion about online voting.

http://www.wypr.org/podcast/midday-politics-tuesday-june-12-12-1-pm

I found myself debating Avi Rubin, an academic who has made a career out of bashing online voting for a very long time. He had his say, and made his boilerplate remarks. Usually there is nobody to counter these claims. But this time I had the opportunity to make my case. The listeners of the program could judge for themselves regarding the validity of both of our arguments.

This is all we advocates ask regarding online voting. All we ask is an opportunity to be part of a balanced discussion on what could be one of the most important issues of our time.

I would like to thank the producers of the “Midday with Dan Rodricks” show for allowing me to take part in the recent discussion. I look forward to future opportunities to do so.

Posted in Online Internet Voting Blog Posts | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Online Voting Advocates – Our numbers are small but growing!

Opponents of online voting in the United States have seen a lot of success when it has come to poisoning the conversation about whether we should be voting using digital methods or whether we should remain in the dark ages of paper ballots. The proof of their success is in the pudding. Many states have turned from mechanical and digital voting methods back to optically scanned paper ballots as a result of the strong, well-organized efforts by “voting integrity” groups who would prefer that we vote on paper forever.

Yes, the “paper worshippers” have been quite successful. Their successful tactics have included a portrayal of online voting advocates as an also well-organized group who are trying to push us prematurely into digital voting. This way supporters of digital voting are seen as naive yet determined, and something to be opposed.

In fact there is no organization of digital voting advocates. There never has been. All of the organization, funding, media connections, and government influence exists on the side of the detractors. Those of us who fight for voter access are VERY small in number.

In fact I began this blog and my own efforts when I realized how one-sided this battle has been. Advocates needed more voices, so I added mine.

I devoted a previous post to an introduction to Dr. William Kelleher, who has stood for digital voting LITERALLY alone for a number of years against this well organized opposition. Despite talking about “groups who push for online voting”, Dr. Kelleher still gets portrayed by detractors as alone, as a “one man show”, portrayals that are part of a pattern of marginalization that is done to anybody who dares to oppose this group.

Well, I was proud to join Bill Kelleher in his advocacy. But to no surprise the marginalization strategy has been focused on me many times since doing so.

But Bill and I are not alone either. There are others who are realizing that the conversation over voter access in a digital world must be more balanced. There are others who are willing to put their energies into seeing that happen.

As Dr. Kelleher has recently done on his blog, Internet Voting For All, I would like to welcome IVoteUS.org to “our side”.

I would also like to take this opportunity to welcome another “IVote”, IVoteUS.com.

Welcome to the conversation IVoteUS.com and IVote-usa.org!

We are now a still small, but rapidly growing group of advocates who only ask for a balanced conversation about one of our most important issues.

Posted in Online Internet Voting Blog Posts | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Follow The Money

In my last post entitled “Polls, polls, and ‘Pols'”, I pointed out how our voting system, election system, and political system all disenfranchise the younger voter to the detriment of us all. I mention how the senior vote is targeted by Television attack ads. In this post I will delve further into those Television ads and why I believe online voting can do away with the stranglehold that the 30 Second TV spot has on our country.

“We must get money out of politics”. How often do we hear this plea lately? The concept that money has corrupted our political and governing system is being talked about all the time these days. To a great degree that is what both Occupy Wall Street and the Tea Party have been about. The first step to getting money out of politics is to focus on where the money is going. Follow the money.

Many of us remember the Watergate era and the concept of “Follow the Money”. In that case, it involved understanding the bigger story around the Watergate break-in by “following the money” from where it was found -in the possession of the Watergate burglars-BACKWARD to where it came from-Richard Nixon.
Understanding how money really controls politics requires us to follow the money-FORWARD-from where it comes from to what it is spent on.

The path of money in politics is no mystery. Everyone knows how special interest money influences politics: By donating that money to the campaigns of elected officials. Everybody also knows what that money is primarily spent ON by those campaigns: Television advertising. The journey is a simple one. We all agree on this.

Political election campaigns are huge cash cows for media interests, which is one of the reasons why it is so difficult to get any traction for discussions that focus on reforming the dynamic of money in politics.

Instead of calling for constitutional amendments that would arbitrarily somehow remove money from politics, how about implementing changes in our voting system that remove the incentive for pouring so much money into our election campaigns?

If all the money goes to TV ads, let’s lessen the impact of those ads on our elections. Of course the next question is: how?
Continue reading

Posted in Online Internet Voting Blog Posts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

State-of-the-Art Online Voting: Cyber The Vote’s Interview with “Everyone Counts” CEO Lori Steele

Everyone Counts CEO Lori Steele on MSNBC, discussing last week's successful iPad voting in Oregon


Too often, critics of online voting are able to frame the discussion as a theoritical one regarding its viability. These critics tend to ignore the existence of companies that have been applying cutting edge technologies in the development of online voting systems for some time. These systems are being used, with great success and great cost savings to taxpayers, around the world.

One such major developer of online voting systems is Everyone Counts, an international company based in San Diego, California. When you consider the existence and use of the systems developed by Everyone Counts, you realize that highly secure online voting is anything but theoretical.
Continue reading

Posted in Online Internet Voting Blog Posts | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Online Voting Supporters – Time to be heard! – Sign the NEW Cyber the Vote petition!

Despite the presence of so much Anti Internet Voting noise, I KNOW that there is support out there for what online voting can achieve.

There are people like me out there, people who understand how online voting can transform our entire political system, by transforming our voting system.

I KNOW you are out there!

Well, it’s time to make your voices heard! Right here, and RIGHT NOW!

Sign the new Cyber The Vote petition. The petition with your signature will be sent, based on the State you indicate, to Secretaries of State ACROSS THE NATION, demanding that your voices be heard and that the will of the people be met.

Add your voice to the movement to empower us all.

After signing the petition, you will be sent a confirmation email to confirm your signature as real. (NO INFORMATION you enter will be used for any other purpose whatsoever.)

Time to get to work and protect our most important right – Our RIGHT to vote!

Thanks,

Rob
————————————–

[[petition-1]]

Posted in Online Internet Voting Blog Posts | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Internet Voting News! California Passes Online Voter Registration! Great News for All American Voters!

On Friday, October 7th, 2011 the State of California took a great step in helping America bring it’s voting system out of the dark ages and into the Information Age!

California has passed an online voter registration law.

“This law will increase voter registration, increase the accuracy of the registration information, and reduce election costs,” said Mark Church, San Mateo County’s chief election officer.

It most certainly will. It will also help online voting advocates make our case that America’s voting system should be updated, as we are updating and transforming all other aspects of our lives, in a way that encourages full voter participation in our democracy. That means online registration AND online voting itself.

The arguments mounted by the Againsters are becoming more and more illogical. The arguments along with those who make the arguments are becoming as out of touch as our “polling place” voting system itself.

Great job, California!


Posted in Online Internet Voting Blog Posts | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Internet Voting: Cost-Benefit Analysis – They forgot the BENEFIT PART!

Online Voting

Cost-Benefit Analysis. Is there anything more basic? It’s like “supply and demand”. You don’t have to be an MBA to understand that with ANY undertaking (in ANY realm be it in business or politics or, gosh, even voting technology) the first thing you do is a cost-benefit analysis. You look at the cost or challenges and analyze them, strive to minimize them, and then you, just as diligently, look at the benefits of the undertaking, and how you could maximize them. Then you compare. Then you weigh. You weigh those two things against each other, and decide if the benefits of the undertaking are worth the risk. You don’t make that decision first, looking only at the risk. You don’t ever do that. Not if you are looking at something seriously.

When it comes to online internet voting, it’s like the joke of “where’s the beef?”.

What happened to the benefit part of the analysis???
Continue reading

Posted in Online Internet Voting Blog Posts | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Internet Voting Astroturf Detractors: Consider the Source – Beware the Againsters!

I mentioned in my last post, a piece about Dr. William Kelleher and his contributions to this movement, that I would be talking next about the “againsters”.

In fact, I have been working on the draft of this post for quite some time. It is one of the most important topics relating to the movement for Internet Voting, or any other grass roots movement for that matter.

Internet Voting could benefit society in countless ways, by increasing voter participation to levels we could only have dreamed of before the Information Age.

Any changes, however, that benefit the greater good will usually also impact some special interest in some way. In general, the more it will affect the general population for the better, the stronger the resistance will come from those special interests.

There are certainly plenty of important examples of this: The electric car, Green energy and even something as straightforward as climate scientists warning us about climate change, which they tell us has been brought about by industrialization and our overdependence on fossil fuels.

Internet voting is no exception. The very concept of voting online has many detractors because the result of Internet Voting would impact special interests. Special interests generally do not like democracy. Fascism by definition is rule by the corporate state.
Continue reading

Posted in Online Internet Voting Blog Posts | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments